You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
We have been putting together ideas to deploy GLPI on our network. So far everything is really working well. I thought I would share some of the things our management has requested to see if it would actually be beneficial to GLPI.
1. The ability for the original ticket creator to re-open a ticket. This way tickets can be closed when they are presumed to be finished. If the problem comes back up, as opposed to opening up a new ticket and having to reference the old ticket, it would be nice if they could simply reopen the old ticket.
2. This one comes more from the business side. A survey after the ticket is closed to measure how the end users experience was regarding the problem.
Your thoughts?
Offline
2 is on the roadmap.
++
Dév. Fedora 29 - PHP 5.6/7.0/7.1/7.2/7.3/7.4 - MariaDB 10.3 - GLPI master
Certifié ITILv3 - RPM pour Fedora, RHEL et CentOS sur https://blog.remirepo.net/
Offline
Any resolution on option 1 (reopening closed ticket)? I am also looking for it.
Offline
Pages: 1